Should We Think More about a "Secular Spirituality?"/ Steve Hamilton
In one of my
past guest posts, I explored the burgeoning scientific endeavors
of neurotheology and the nature of consciousness and
spirituality, mysticism and empirical data. I have been digging a bit
further in this, and while getting some background with Walter
Brueggemann and of course Dietrich Bonhoeffer's initial thoughts on religionless
Christinaity, I've been reflecting on the challenges and
opportunities
of a centered-set secular spirituality (say that 5 times fast!), and I
wanted to
share a few observations with you and ask for any input or response to
this line
of thought that all of you great thinkers might have.
It seems to me that spirituality among my secular
friends presents lots of upside for explorations of faith and the
significance of why we do certain things and the meaning behind them in a
centered-set, Stage 4 Faith kind of way. For instance, as Anne Van
Dusen
of the Alban Institute
has noted, in a
secular spirituality, traditionally religious rituals can be practiced
without a
specific religious content or apprehension. The 'church wedding' is a
good
example. What used to be a religious ritual has evolved into a secular
or
cultural practice. It remains a deeply significant experience, but often
it
lacks religious underpinnings for many of the attendees or perhaps even
those
being married. What is interesting in our recent history is that ritual
-
as some sort of symbolic outward expression of a deeper significance
- is increasingly embraced in ordinary experiences, not just the
private reserve of religious folk.
For instance, from the view of a secular spirituality, can we
witness that
a group of friends gathering to share a meal and "check-in" with each
other has
some similarity to ancient practices of a prayer circle? Or perhaps
you've
been a part of the deeply secular yet spiritual experience of singing
around a campfire? As I've explored some of these thoughts on secular
spirituality with some of my Christian friends, I wonder at the typical
reaction: "...that's all good for a horizontal-kind of spiritual
experience
but what about the vertical-kind, what about connection to
Jesus?" Fair enough, except somehow I keep wondering: how do you
really know there isn't some vertical aspect just because it isn't
necessarily
acknowledged or made explicit? Van Dusen has observed that in the
religious setting, ritual can provide access to a deeper experience of
faith and
spirit. Of course, ritual itself can nurture and structure faith.
Likewise, in
the secular setting, such ritual serves as a framework that organizes
and
catalogs individual spiritual experience....as spirituality becomes part
of
everyday culture and even replaces traditional religion and religious
practice
at certain points, the gap between those with a faith affiliation and
those
without widens. This is especially the case that some of us have
witnessed to in the secular centers of many cities that we
inhabit. Religious organizations are challenged to offer seekers a means
for spiritual connection that is not necessarily available in secular
society,
and many of my secular friends nowadays look at a typical Sunday church
experience and claim that it is merely a knock-off of something they
witness or
experience in their "normal" secular world...and a cheap knock-off a
that.
OK, fair enough.
One of the ways to meet the challenges of secular spirituality that
has been pointed to over and over again is the Roman Catholic church's
effort
to sponsor "Tap Room Theology" sessions. These were mainly about
hosting conversations in venues that very Stage 3 college students
frequented; the premise is that religious leaders work within the
existing
cultural parameters (students hanging out in bars and restaurants) to
find a
venue for conversation about faith and cultural issues. I'm sure that
idea
is fairly familiar to many of us here at this blog, not to mention some
of us
are actually doing it, like our friend Kenny Petrowski, whose church
actually meets at the Trash Bar in Brooklyn, NY. There seems to be some focus on
intentionally positioning ourselves in certain venues or seeking common
ground, whether that be at a bar or coffee house or as Van Dusen
elaborates: "A shared secular culture "homogenizes" the collective
experience of those who, due to different faith or experiences, might
not be
able to connect. An immigrant from Haiti may have little in common with a
sixth-generation Bostonian, but both are likely to be familiar with
Disney or
the Simpsons...see Mark Pinsky's The
Gospel According to Disney and The
Gospel According to the Simpsons,"
So I'm wondering what you all think about secular spirituality and
the
opportunities and challenges therein? Can or should we foster a
centered-set secular spirituality with Jesus as the center of the
set? Would all this link to other efforts (like centered-set
worship or worship
as the calling card of a centered set) to foster or network
people for some Stage 4 Faith revival that has been so much of our
conversation lately?
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e552e3404e88330120a8fc52bc970b
Should We Think More about a "Secular Spirituality?"/ Steve Hamilton
In one of my
past guest posts, I explored the burgeoning scientific endeavors
of neurotheology and the nature of consciousness and
spirituality, mysticism and empirical data. I have been digging a bit
further in this, and while getting some background with Walter
Brueggemann and of course Dietrich Bonhoeffer's initial thoughts on religionless
Christinaity, I've been reflecting on the challenges and
opportunities
of a centered-set secular spirituality (say that 5 times fast!), and I
wanted to
share a few observations with you and ask for any input or response to
this line
of thought that all of you great thinkers might have.
It seems to me that spirituality among my secular
friends presents lots of upside for explorations of faith and the
significance of why we do certain things and the meaning behind them in a
centered-set, Stage 4 Faith kind of way. For instance, as Anne Van
Dusen
of the Alban Institute
has noted, in a
secular spirituality, traditionally religious rituals can be practiced
without a
specific religious content or apprehension. The 'church wedding' is a
good
example. What used to be a religious ritual has evolved into a secular
or
cultural practice. It remains a deeply significant experience, but often
it
lacks religious underpinnings for many of the attendees or perhaps even
those
being married. What is interesting in our recent history is that ritual
-
as some sort of symbolic outward expression of a deeper significance
- is increasingly embraced in ordinary experiences, not just the
private reserve of religious folk.